SURFACE & SYMBOL
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • PORTFOLIO
    • ARTWORK
    • PHOTOGRAPHY
  • ABOUT ME

Dawn Wall Explained

1/5/2015

25 Comments

 
Picture
Photo: Brett Lowell / Big Up Productions
Yesterday, The New York Times wrote an article about Tommy Caldwell and Kevin Jorgeson's ongoing attempt at free climbing the Dawn Wall on El Capitan in Yosemite. I read the article first and then made a rookie move: I started reading the comments section, which was littered with ignorant (unsurprising) and negative (surprising) responses by people who are clearly non-climbers.  I am no expert in rock climbing, especially big wall / multi-pitch logistics, but I know enough to feel that the Dawn Wall dream warrants a detailed and lengthy response directed specifically at those unfamiliar with the climbing world.  I am going to break this down as clearly and concisely as possible, to the point that many of these items may seem too tedious for my experienced climber friends.  Here goes:

What is Free Climbing?
This seems to be the most contentious item in the comments.  And I don't blame people because the article is very confusing.  The author doesn't clarify what free climbing is and a lot of non-climbers, and even some self-proclaimed climbers, erroneously think that Caldwell/Jorgeson are free soloing this route without ropes. They are not free soloing, they are free climbing.  Let's have a quick terminology lesson:

Leader / Lead Climber: The rope is attached to the lead climber, who ascends the route and brings the rope up as he or she climbs. The leader will clip the rope into points of protection, which can be either fixed or temporary, that are in the wall along the way. If the climber were to fall, the belayer would "catch" the climber with the rope.

Belayer: The rope is also attached to the belayer, who feeds slack in the rope to the leader as he or she moves up the wall.  Depending on the type of route or the location on a mult-pitch, the belayer could be belaying from either below the lead climber or above the climber who is following up the route. The belayer will "catch" the climber with the rope if he or she falls.

Free Climbing: *This is the type of climbing that Caldwell and Jorgeson are engaged in while ascending Dawn Wall.* The lead climber ascends the rock wall with only the use of his or her hands and feet.  The lead climber is connected to a rope and belayed by his or her climbing partner, but does not use the rope or any other forms of aid to ascend the wall.  If the climber falls, the belayer catches the climber using the rope. However, the rope in no way assists the climber in moving up the wall. Again, the rope is only there to catch and protect the climber in the event of a fall.  Here is a video of Chris Sharma and Adam Ondra free climbing on one of the hardest routes in the world.  Note that the rope catches them when they fall, but they don't use the rope to ascend.  Additionally, to confuse things even more, free climbing can be subdivided into traditional climbing and sport climbing. 

Free Solo Climbing / Soloing: The climber ascends the rock wall with only the use of his or her hands and feet. The climber is not connected to a rope and therefore is not belayed by a climbing partner.  There are no forms of aid or protection. If the climber falls, he or she will fall to the ground.  Most people are familiar with Alex Honnold for free soloing many routes, and was featured on 60 Minutes in 2011. 

Aid Climbing: The climber ascends the rock wall by moving up the rope with the direct help of aid devices, such as etriers, aiders, and ascenders. This video (skip to minute 1:00 or 1:20) shows some aspects of aid climbing, including "jugging" up the rope. The couple in the video is ascending The Nose on El Capitan.  Aid climbing is typically done when the rock wall is deemed too difficult to "free climb" (refer to above).  However, some multi-pitch routes use a mix of free climbing and aid climbing, depending on the difficulty in particular sections / pitches. Historically, Yosemite big wall routes were mostly climbed using aiders.


Why is this a big deal?
That leads me to the next question that I've seen pop up repeatedly: Why is The New York Times writing an article about two guys ascending a big wall in Yosemite, which has been done by so many others in the past 40 years?

Basically, people who say that are wrong. This particular route, The Dawn Wall, has never been climbed in the way that Caldwell and Jorgeson are doing it. 

It boils down to a terminology misunderstanding again. Like I mentioned above, historically, Yosemite routes have been aid climbed, not free climbed or free soloed. Caldwell and Jorgeson are climbing a big wall route that has never in history been free climbed.  So yes, to the commenters from the article, many people have climbed this route, but only with the use of aids. 

The Dawn Wall, located on the granite monolith El Capitan, in Yosemite National Park, is a 3,000 foot route that is broken down into about 30 different pitches, ranging in difficulty from 5.13 to 5.14+. Because of the sheer difficulty of the moves and the endurance required, this section of El Capitan has always been aid climbed. Here is a great breakdown of the logistics and various pitches of free climbing the Dawn Wall.


What are the legitimate risks?
All climbing is inherently dangerous. But so is driving or cycling or playing football.  Rock climbing, when done safely and correctly, can be no more or less risky than other activities we engage in on a daily basis. Back in May, I wrote a post that touches on the aspects of minimizing risk while climbing. 

However, let's look at what Caldwell and Jorgeson are doing specifically.  The biggest misconception and concern from non-climbers is that they think if Caldwell or Jorgeson fall, then they will fall to the ground. I apologize for beating a dead horse here, but it is necessary to reiterate that if one climber falls while ascending, they will be caught by the other climber (the "belayer") with the rope.  In fact, both Caldwell and Jorgeson are falling quite a lot. The routes they are free climbing are extremely difficult, so falling can be more aptly described as an inevitability. When the climber falls, then he is forced to try that section of the route all over again. As you can imagine, finishing a section of the route can take a long time if climbers are falling often. Because the wall is so flat, which is the same reason that makes the climb so difficult, most falls are probably clean and void of hazards. Also, this means that there is less risk of the rope rubbing against sharp areas of rock.

What are some other potential risks? Well, gear could pop out of the wall or ropes or harness could break. However, this is incredibly unlikely.  Knowledgeable, professional climbers like Caldwell and Jorgeson are fully aware of how to maintain their equipment and when it's time to "retire" a rope, harness, etc. The vast majority of injuries or deaths from climbing are due to human error.  Not always, but very often, this is due to inexperienced and untrained novices attempting to climb outside.  Here is a great resource on safety while big wall climbing in Yosemite.

And for all those folks who are reprimanding Caldwell for climbing this route and taking these risks while he has a 20-month-old and a wife at home:

- One commentor said it best, "Climbing requires an intense focus on where you are and who you are with, and it teaches this focus better than anything I have done in my long life. It taught me trust, thoroughness, problem solving skills, how to read character in others and in myself, and it gave me a chance to understand how big the world is beyond my small problems... To give a child the knowledge of how to climb well, and to do it safely (yes, it is very, very safe when done right) is one of the best things a parent can do."

- His wife, Becca Caldwell, married this man knowing exactly who he is. Her Facebook page seems to indicate that she is very supportive of this endeavor.


What are the environmental and economical impacts?
Three of the most popular questions (although often these questions are listed as accusations) that I have seen over and over again are:

1. Where does the poop go? In short: a poop tube. Pretty self explanatory. Not sure you need or want more information. However, in case you do, Yosemite has very clear guidelines about what you are supposed to do with human waste and trash. My favorite line is the first one: "It is illegal to throw anything off a cliff in Yosemite." That includes, well, you know...

2. How does this negatively effect the rock / El Capitan? In short: not very much. Most of the protection that Caldwell and Jorgeson are using are temporary. However, many readers and non-climbers seem concerned that Caldwell and Jorgeson are permanently damaging the rock. My first thought when reading this is, even if they are using fixed/permanent protection such as bolts that have been drilled into the rock, no one can actually see these tiny bolts when they are standing on the ground. Maybe I could spot a bolt that is 100 feet up if the sunlight hits it just right. But 1000 feet up? No way in hell. 

Caldwell and Jorgeson are likely using spring-loaded cams that are placed in cracks and can be easily removed after the climb is complete. They are also likely using permanent bolts that have been placed by previous climbers. 

But this whole issue begs the question: Why do we have National Parks in the first place? What is this land here for, if not to enjoy it? One commentor expressed that people who climb El Capitan are making better use of the National Park than those who drive through it and give it a cursory glance and a snap of their camera and then move on. I agree. Climbers experience the rock and embrace the power that is El Capitan, or any rock formation in the world. They touch it with their fingers and love it with their desire to be a part of nature. In return, the rock challenges them and helps them grow as humans. The damage done to the rock itself is minimal, especially in comparison to the amount of exhaust and litter that millions of people bring into Yosemite each year.

3. Who pays for rescue operations if they get hurt? In short: Yosemite Search and Rescue. However, it's slightly more complicated than that, given that some funds come from the federal account that supports the National Parks and some funds come from a nonprofit organization called Friends of YOSAR.  In fact, most rescue missions aren't due to climbers.  According to Friends of YOSAR, "roughly 60% of YOSAR rescue missions have involved hikers, either one who have become lost in the wilderness or are injured on the trails."

What is the greater purpose?
Many people are asking questions such as: What's the point? Why climb this wall? Don't give me the age old response "Because it's there." That's not good enough this time. How is this endeavor more important than climbing Everest, going to the Moon, helping solve world hunger, etc? Isn't this just a publicity stunt?

Caldwell has been working on this route, attempting parts of it and working out logistics, for about 8 years. This is not a publicity stunt. Caldwell and Jorgeson are sponsored, professional climbers who have made their lives and careers about rock climbing. The cameras that are following them are not solicited by Caldwell and Jorgeson, but are following the ascent because it is newsworthy.

What's the point? Why climb this wall? Okay... Why do we do anything? As one commenter said, why paint the Mona Lisa? I don't believe that you can fully grasp the rewards of rock climbing unless you have tried it yourself. It's a challenge to your mind and body simultaneously.  Every muscle is working to move up the wall, and at the same time, you are battling your fears and your doubts. Each climb is a puzzle that needs to be solved. 

This puzzle, free climbing the Dawn Wall, is just the next step for climbers. Climbing Everest, landing on the moon, solving world hunger - these are all valid puzzles in themselves. Climbers ask the question: How far and how high and how hard can I go? If we don't ask these questions and attempt to overcome them, the human race will never improve.

More importantly, why do some people feel the need to put down or judge other people's dreams? We are all driven by different forces and it's unfair to say one is better than the other. 

That's all I got.

Good luck Tommy Caldwell and Kevin Jorgeson!




25 Comments
Jonny
1/6/2015 01:04:15 am

Excellent post. Sadly, the ignorant many who comment on NYT articles... who need to read this are probably unlikely to be swerved from their narrow mindedness even if they do. But that's ok. We have our mountains, they can have their Reality TV episodes.

Reply
Monica
1/6/2015 01:54:06 am

Hey Jonny - thanks so much for reading! I believe you are probably right... but I was so frustrated reading the comments on the NYT article and thought that writing my blog post would help me feel better, even if no one else read it!

Reply
Maureen
1/6/2015 03:19:48 am

Good information. My daughter has been trying to teach this flat-lander more about her passion for climbing, This helped bring some things into focus.

Reply
Monica
1/6/2015 03:27:55 am

Hi Maureen - that's so great to hear! Thanks for reading and good luck educating the non-climbers out there :)

Reply
George
1/6/2015 04:10:17 am

Good summary and hope people get here from the NYT article. I, do, though disagree with you on both the effects climbers have on the terrain and that they're somehow more pure users of parks (vs. someone "just driving through."). Nope. The latter is an elitism that's really annoying and only stokes the already super-egos of climbers. Everyone -- whether hiking, climbing or cruising in their (admittedly) annoying super motorhome -- is at least getting out of their car port at home and experiencing their parks on their own terms.

To a great extent, the NPS sets many of those terms and, here, we disagree again. One of them is to have as little impact on the terrain as possible. I don't really want to get into the bolt debate, but you can't dismiss it as trivial because you can't see it. That's not the point of a leave no trace philosophy. Sure, bolting has mostly escaped this ethos but shouldn't be dismissed. National Parks are not there solely for enjoyment. They are there to preserve a landscape and ecosystem that's unique. You can't -- and shouldn't -- defend destructive uses simply because it's a way to enjoy the park. (and here I include the erosion of lichens and mosses from ledges and walls as a direct result of climbing; and the disturbance of nesting sites).

In my experience (10 years as a ranger in Yosemite in the 70s and, after that, Sequoia Kings to present) climbers are no more (or less) careful and caring of their direct environment than anyone else. I've found endless trash at the base of popular climbs -- in fact, more than I'd find around campsites. Which is all to say that while climbing is definitely an acceptable and even admirable use of a park, it shouldn't be represented as some holy quest.

Reply
Monica
1/6/2015 05:34:55 am

George! Thanks for reading and actually thinking about the topics I raised. I do agree with you in the sense that my thought process about "better use of the parks" is elitist... I hadn't originally thought about it that way, but you are right. However, where do we draw the line? I dont think climbers are better than hikers, or anyone is better than anyone else in the purist sense (no one person is better than another). But I do wonder in the big scheme of things, should bolting be allowed? If not, then what should be allowed in the parks?

The only thing I hope is that we (as climbers and visitors of national parks), will continue to minimize the impact we have on the landscape around us. I think we are in an era where we (as a society) are having to undo a lot of the attitudes from the previous generations. We are learning more about what is acceptable and what is harmful. I know climbers who are very eco-conscious and some who definitely are not. In no way am I saying we are without fault. But I think in general, climbers or hikers who spend a lot of time outside understand the "rules" a bit better than those people who are merely passing through as tourists.

The majority of my post was to clarify the logistics of the type of climbing, but its important to open the conversation to what is acceptable usage in our parks. And you clearly have way more experience and knowledge in these areas than I do so I really appreciate your input!

Reply
Dan
1/6/2015 06:04:39 am

Well, it's not like the parks themselves are pristine anyway. "No fire" policies have significantly altered the plant life in places like Yosemite Valley, as have actions like blowing up large rocks that dammed the Merced River, so that it now flows in a channel rather than spreading out across the valley floor. Besides, how many people are really going to notice pins stuck in the face of El Capitan or Half Dome?

Reply
Evan
1/6/2015 05:16:29 am

Thank you for the explanation and information. I am a non-climber but find it fascinating and am amazed at what they are able to accomplish.

Reply
Monica
1/6/2015 05:36:50 am

Thanks for reading, Evan! These two men are definitely inspirational!

Reply
Dan
1/6/2015 06:00:00 am

Excellent explanation.

Reply
Monica
1/8/2015 12:16:19 am

Thanks Dan! :)

Reply
Rachel
1/6/2015 06:49:09 am

Thank you for writing this! The language in the NYT article was indeed unclear, and I'm grateful for your explanations of terminology I didn't understand. I climbed my first indoor wall ever last week, and fell in love. I can't imagine the strength, determination, focus, and courage it takes to do what these guys are doing. Thanks again for writing this post. You created something helpful and educational instead of just stewing in your annoyance. Bravo!

Reply
Monica
1/6/2015 10:52:01 pm

Hi Rachel! I definitely struggled with not getting annoyed with comments, but ultimately many of those people are either trolling or not interested in viewpoints outside of their comfort zone. But I did hope that there would be a handful of people who were open to learning new things and would actually take the time to read my post. Thank for reading!

Reply
Tom
1/6/2015 07:30:29 am

Monica, my friend and colleague is a climber who has spent years in Yosemite, including El Cap. You have greatly enlightened me about what he does, and why; thank you. One silly question - how do you retrieve a temporary bolt if you have already climbed past it? Climb back down and get it while being belayed from above?

Reply
Daniel
1/7/2015 02:19:54 pm

Bolts are by far most commonly permanent. Removable protection is removed by the 2nd climber before moving past it as he/she is belayed from above.

Reply
Monica
1/8/2015 12:10:14 am

Daniel - thanks for responding to Tom's question!

Tom - I am glad you enjoyed reading and found some useful information in my post :)

Emily
1/6/2015 02:28:28 pm

Thank you so much for putting this explanation together! I came over from the NYT article (saw your link in the comments, and had already read your other comments, which made sense).

I have several acquaintances who are hard-core climbers (and had a friend/coworker, a highly experienced climber who lost his life a couple of years ago climbing on Mt. Hood, Mark Cartier) but none has explained the basic definitions as you have here.

I feel a bit more climbing-literate now, and for that I thank you.

It does seem that people involved in climbing, distance running, and back-country skiing are driven by some of the same passions - how far can I push myself, how can I fine tune my preparation, workout, diet to do better next time...all the while knowing the only person whose judgment matters is one's own.

So, now I think I have a little more in common with climbers than I realized before :).

Reply
Monica
1/7/2015 01:57:38 am

Hi Emily! I am sorry to hear about your friend who passed away. I am glad that my post could help you understand some of the motivations we feel as climbers. I didn't even touch upon aspects of climbing such as workout/cross-training and diet - but those do play a huge part in many climbers' preparation and training. And each climber will have very different aspirations and goals within their climbing hobby or career. My goals are very modest, and mostly boil down to hitting mid-level grades (like 5.12) and learning how to quiet the voice in my head that can sometimes panic with fear! As long as I am improving mentally or phsyically, I am content. Thanks for reading!

Reply
Kris
1/7/2015 02:41:49 am

Great post. I sent this to my parents (who don't quite understand climbing at all, just know that I'm really into it!) and I received this response:

"The article you attached, clearly written by a committed climber, explains more, but still is not very clear; the author should have let someone completely unfamiliar with rock climbing read it first and then re-written it to ensure that it answered clearly that person's questions. It reminds me of reading an explanation of the game of cricket by someone who is an aficionado, so enthusiastic about it that he/she is unable to explain it to someone completely ignorant of the game, and is just a little condescending towards those who may not agree that cricket is the best game there is! Here are just a couple of examples of problems with the explanation, starting with the very first paragraph:

-- "Lead/Lead climber": "The leader will clip the rope into points of protection" -- no non-climber would understand what this means. Is a "point of protection" a bolt screwed into the rock? How safe is that? Or is it something else? How does the leader "clip" the rope? Who has put the "points of protection" there, and when? Again, if there are bolts, how are they drilled or screwed into the rock? How long are they safe for? What if it rains, or has rained recently? What if the rock, or part of it, falls due to the sudden addition of the weight of climbers, which may sometimes be completely supported by a single bolt? At what point might the bolt come out -- how much weight can it bear? How long is the bolt, anyway?

-- same paragraph: "If the climber were to fall, the belayer would "catch" the climber with the rope." Best not to use terms unfamiliar to most people (like "belayer") without defining them first. What if the climber weighs 200 pounds and the "belayer" one hundred pounds? What does it mean to "catch" the climber? How is the rope attached to the climber? Might it not slide off?

Just a few random questions. I have many more, including the mysterious terms etriers, aiders, and ascenders, which are mentioned in the article but not defined. Why mention strange terms but not define them?

Still, on the whole, more clear than the two NYTimes articles!"

Reply
Monica
1/7/2015 04:24:10 am

Hey Kris - haha well, these are all really good questions and I don’t mind at all that your parents need clarification. I think it’s sweet and thoughtful that they are interested in learning about climbing because of your interest in the sport.

However, it’s going to be difficult for me to explain some of these things without a ton of pictures and/or showing them in person.

I am going to follow up separately via email so that I can include links to pictures and videos, which is difficult to do in this comments section. Keep an eye out later today!

Reply
Alec
1/7/2015 11:25:04 pm

This article is extremely helpful. Thanks!

Reply
Monica
1/8/2015 12:15:41 am

Bohehehe thanks :P

Reply
Roseann Melli
1/9/2015 12:47:41 pm

Excellent read well written and informative.

Reply
Seth D link
1/13/2021 11:22:33 pm

Hello mate great bllog

Reply
Clemens
1/4/2022 02:38:24 pm

Great blog post! I love going back and reading all those comments on the NYT article, crazy how much awareness of climbing, especially after the olympics and before that Free Solo, has increased in the last 7 years.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    About Me

    Climber
    Artist
    Corporate Slave

    Archives

    January 2015
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012

    Picture

    Categories

    All
    5.11
    Access Fund
    Animals
    Babies
    Bisharat
    Bishop
    Bond Of The Rope
    Bouldering
    Buildering
    California
    Chimney Rock
    Chris Sharma
    Climbing
    Climbing Shoes
    Convict Lake
    Crack Climbing
    Creativity
    Crowder's
    Crux
    Cute
    Dawn
    Depression
    Downgrading
    Eastern Sierras
    Evening Sends
    Evolv
    Ferryland
    Gaia
    Goals
    Grades
    Hidden Valley
    Home Climbing
    Home Wall
    Ice Climbing
    Inside
    Instinct
    Joshua Tree
    Katana
    La Sportiva
    Leading
    Legislation
    Leopard Seal
    Lifstyle
    Lone Pine
    Malibu
    Mammoth
    Medicine
    Meditation
    Mono Lake
    Moose
    Mountain
    Mountain Hardwear
    Mountains
    Muira
    Mylar
    Nature
    Newfoundland
    North Carolina
    Off-season
    Off The Grid
    Outdoor Retailer
    Outside
    Painting
    Paul Nicklen
    Penguin
    Photography
    Pilot
    Point Dume
    Polar Bear
    Posture
    Psicobloc
    Pythons
    Relationships
    Resolutions
    Risk
    Running
    Safety
    Sasha Digiulian
    Scarpa
    Seal
    Shaman
    Shutter Settings
    Sport Climbing
    Stoney Point
    Sugarbagging
    Ted
    Tito
    Top Rope
    Top-Rope
    Training
    Traversa
    Treadmill
    Tv
    Vietnam
    Water
    Weekly Favorites
    Wilderness
    Wildlife
    Writing
    Yoga

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.